Your doctor had 3 minutes.
You deserve more than that.
We're an AI research team that does the deep-dive literature review your doctor doesn't have time for. One condition at a time, researched in depth, verified by independent AI pair review. Every claim cites a published source so you and your doctor can check it together.
If you have Peyronie's Disease
We've researched it. Brian's case is below: 40+ verified references, an Appointment Kit with 5 evidence-backed questions for your urologist, and the full Evidence Reference behind every claim.
Built for Brian's specific case. Your questions may be different.
Have a different condition?
Tell us about your situation. This is week one — we have one condition researched in depth. That number grows based on what readers ask us to investigate.
Share Your Situation →Currently researched: Peyronie's Disease
Most requested: Tell us which condition to research next →
Why This Exists
Throughout my life I have had terrible experiences with doctors. When my daughter was a toddler, she was on Medicaid — I was an elementary school teacher. We took her to a specialist for an elbow problem. The doctor walked in. He didn't ask questions. He didn't take an x-ray. He didn't inspect her elbow. He immediately said, "I have been writing books and studying this condition for several years..." He diagnosed her with a rare bone disorder and said she'd need a cast for one year. I told him we would be leaving. A second opinion confirmed it was nursemaid's elbow — a nerve that pops out of place. She grew out of it.
Then last year I suffered an injury to a very private part of my body. At first I was confused. I thought maybe I had an infection, but then the pain became unbearable. I went to a specialist. He spoke to me for two minutes and scheduled a Doppler ultrasound — three months out. I found another facility that could do it in two weeks, but his office refused to accept any Doppler performed elsewhere. So I waited. My condition worsened — the pain died back but the deformity became significantly worse. When I finally got the Doppler and the injection, he said "In three months we will see how the disease has progressed." I haven't heard back about scheduling the follow-up.
I had spent the last eight months building a system where multiple AI agents collaborate, push back on each other's conclusions, and verify each other's work. So here I was: no money, no profits, my personal body breaking in ways that were terrifying, and no improvements to show for it. I pointed my AI team at my own disease — Peyronie's disease.
And what did I find? First: there were ZERO controlled studies showing the injection I'd been given works for this disease (Favilla 2017, n=140: exactly zero curvature change). Then: in every single study that did test it, they used biweekly or monthly injections — NO ONE ever did three months. Then: there IS an FDA-approved treatment for this condition. It was never mentioned to me. Not once, in months of visits.
Maybe no one wants this. I honestly don't know. But I built this because I needed it — and if you're dealing with something similar, share your situation and we'll see if we can do for you what I did for myself.
To be continued — I'm still in this. Read the full story → · More about Brian →
Stay Updated
Get notified when we publish new research. One email per case — no spam.
Newsletter powered by Substack. Unsubscribe anytime.
How We Work
We read the research your doctor didn't have time to.
- Every claim cites a published source.
- Two AI readers verify independently.
- Disagreements are resolved transparently.
How this content is made — and what that means for you
This platform is built and maintained by a coordinated team of AI research agents. There is no human doctor, nurse, or medical professional reviewing the content. Brian Glen operates the pipeline — he directs the research, coordinates the agents, and makes editorial decisions — but he is not a medical professional and does not review medical claims.
What the AI team does:
- Screens thousands of published studies to find the most relevant evidence for each condition
- Every article is read independently by two AI agents who compare findings before anything is written
- A separate AI pair reviews the finished output for accuracy, evidence classification, and citation integrity
- Every factual claim cites a specific published source — you and your doctor can verify any claim by checking the reference
What this means for you:
- This is research material to help you prepare for conversations with your doctor. It is not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendation.
- Despite multiple verification layers, errors are possible. AI systems can misinterpret sources, miss context, or make mistakes that human reviewers might catch.
- Every claim links to its source. If something doesn't look right, check the citation — and tell us. We correct errors publicly.
- Your doctor knows your full medical history. We don't. Always discuss findings with a qualified healthcare provider before making treatment decisions.
Why we're telling you this: Because hiding it would be dishonest. And because knowing exactly how this content was made — including its limitations — is what lets you use it responsibly. Transparency isn't a disclaimer. It's the foundation of trust.